SAMURAI COMMANDO: MISSION 1549 aka SENGOKU JIEITAI 1549 (SENGOKU SELF DEFENSE FORCE 1549)
Yosuke Eguchi (Kashima Yosuke), Kyoka Suzuki (Kanzaki), Kazuki Kitamura (Shichibei), Takeshi Kaga (Tsuyoshi Matoba/Oda Nobunaga), Masato Ibu (Dohsan Saito), Haruka Ayase (Princess Nou), Akiyoshi Nakao (Tosuke), Katsuhisa Namase (Major Mori), Daisuke Shima (Mikuni), Koji Matoba (Yoda)
Directed by Masaaki Tezuka
The Short Version: This 2005 remake of the violent 1979 samurai/fantasy spectacular starring Sonny Chiba lacks the gruesome and gritty air of that film substituting grim theatrics with melodramatic bravado and heavier sci fi elements. It's mildly diverting, but not nearly as memorable as the original 139 minute original starring Sonny Chiba.
Note: This is a combination review and Remakes: Redux, Or Ridiculous entry comparing the two pictures. Click the highlighted title for the review of the original 1979 production: SENGOKU JIEITAI (1979).
Major Mori of the Ground Self Defense Force and Lt. Kanzaki seek the aid of ex Lieutenant Kashima Yusuke, now running a restaurant, to lead a rescue team to be sent back in time to find Colonel Matoba, who disappeared two years earlier as part of 'Experimental Unit 3', a military unit testing a new magnetic shield. Matoba and his men were thrust back in time to the Feudal Era of japan when warlords battled for control of the country. Matoba has seriously altered history which has been causing an increasing number of deadly ripple effects in the present. He plans to create a new history for Japan by making the future extinct. Kashima and Mori are assigned to eliminate him and reverse the damage done and make it back to their own time within 68 hours before they, too, are trapped in the past.
Kadokawa Productions celebrated its 60th anniversary with this remake of the Kadokawa Production from 1979. The man responsible for some of the most lively and action packed entries in the 'Millennium Series' of Godzilla pictures was given the task of remaking one of Sonny Chiba's most popular movies (although it was met with lots of fan indifference outside of Japan). Chiba, himself, cited it as one of his most enjoyable motion pictures he ever worked on. The original movie was also a huge success in its native Japan. The science fiction novel by Ryo Hanmura has proven popular with Japanese audiences as it also was the source of a mini series in 2003. Both the 1979 and '05 versions have similarities, but both are also very different from one another. When the '79 film was released in America (retitled G.I. SAMURAI), it was shorn of some 45 minutes of footage leaving nothing but the expansive battle sequences to marvel at.
Despite his propensity for directing entertaining examples of popcorn thrills, Tezuka pays a great deal of respect to the source material retaining much character interplay as opposed to lots of flashy effects work. Sadly, all this characterization falls flat amidst the more fantastical attributes of the plot. Save for one, or two actors, much of the cast fail to bring their characters to life. Considering this movie is brimming with jingoism (every character gets a grand speech, or send off before they expire), it all means little when the performers do little with what they're given.
Curiously, a US production from 1980 entitled THE FINAL COUNTDOWN (starring Kirk Douglas and Martin Sheen) shared a very similar plotline to the Japanese film from 1979. That film dealt with a crew on an aircraft carrier that are taken back to the days leading up to the attack on Pearl Harbor. They are placed in a position as to interfere with history or let it carry its course. The Japanese epic from the year prior featured the same arc--Sonny Chiba and his team were faced with altering Japan's history. Attempting to get back to their own time, the group was faced with the fact that it might not be possible to do so. The unit splits up into groups--one seeing the benefit of running wild in a violent era and the other trying to leave well enough alone not knowing the full consequences of their actions may drastically affect the future.
TIME SLIP (1979)
Eventually, Chiba and his now dwindled motley clutch of heroes decide it might be best to rule in the Feudal Era. He embraces his samurai spirit and although it isn't established, Chiba's character becomes Nobunaga Oda, the historical unifier of the Warring States of Japan's past. This same premise is also in evidence in the 2005 version, but with some major differences. Tezuka's movie retains the epic feel of the original, but adopts a more linear fantasy approach that allows for as much action and special effects as possible. Obviously, Tezuka had a bit more funds to play with, but the original is no pushover. The newer films science fiction angle introduces a number of implausible elements during the films 119 minute running time that keeps its scenario firmly entrenched within the realm of a manga. Oddly enough, the streamlined approach to the 86 minute international version of the Japanese 2005 film mirrors the gutted treatment Chiba's original was given for its US release; For some, less is indeed more (more on the 86 minute cut later).
An example of just how outrageous Tezuka's movie becomes occurs when our "rescue team" are captured in an ambush by a group of samurai warriors. They are taken to a fortress surrounding a surreal, modernized castle with an oil refinery built next to it! Taken to the leader, Kashima and company discover that the man they were sent to bring back/kill has assumed the mantle of Nobunaga Oda after having killed him in a battle. Matoba/Oda plans to use a nuclear device(!) he has constructed to cause Mt. Fuji to erupt with even more devastating force. This change in Japan's past will kill 6 billion people in Japan's future for the greater good of Matoba's new, stronger Japan. This is the main crux of the plot in the new film. The original has a bit of this, but it's more of a side story wherein one of Iba's (Chiba) men, a bit on the demented side, takes it upon himself to zip around the coast pillaging and raping villagers with little regard as to the havoc being caused both in the past and the future.
TIME SLIP/SENGOKU JIEITAI (1979)
SENGOKU JIEITAI 1549 (2005)
There are minor homages to Mitsumasa Saito's '79 adaptation such as a shock moment when the soldiers first realize they are not in friendly territory. It happens at the very beginning in the newer film and a little bit later in the original. One of the more noticeable changes are the action scenes. In the '79 film, the fights are incredibly raw, bloody and barbaric. There's a realism to them that is sorely lacking in the '05 film. There's nothing at all memorable about them. The action itself, such as the war scenes and explosions overshadow what little samurai action there is. Tezuka does manage some striking imagery such as the armor covered swordsmen brandishing machine guns, but the choreography in the scant few swordplay scenes makes one long for the JAC.
But even with all its stylish and extravagant special effects, nothing in SAMURAI COMMANDO comes close to the concluding 30 minute battle sequence in TIME SLIP. It's an amazingly violent piece of grandeur that is one of the most gripping battles I've seen in a movie like this. Mitsumasa Saito creates a staggering sense of hopelessness as Iba and his fleeting, ragtag band battle against thousands of samurai and ninja in a gruesome last stand. For the new film, the final battle isn't nearly as exciting, but it is filled with Hollywood level effects work and dozens of massive explosions which, in this day and age, is a logical trade off.
Tezuka's movie also plays things safe when compared with the original. In that film, the gore flowed freely, but here, there's only a few such scenes and at least one is a spray of CGI gore. The Chiba film also contains a fair bit of sex and nudity, but there's none of that in the '05 version. The newer film is much safer for general audiences than the much earlier production.
The newer production also sports a wholly subtle soundtrack (compared with the export versions rousing orchestral score) while the original, like every other Japanese production of that time, contains a series of pop songs, power ballads and synth score. The score for the Chiba movie is quite strange, but I liked it, unlike seemingly everyone else. The score for Tezuka's movie mostly fails to set the tone for the adventure ahead, but the much shorter export version succeeds admirably in this department. While it's not a bad movie by any stretch, Masaaki Tezuka's tale of Samurai & Soldiers is a bit disappointing when compared with the original film starring Sonny Chiba.
Below are alterations between the two films as well as differences to the much shorter international version to Masaaki Tezuka's 2005 production...
1979: Chiba and company are transported back in time to Feudal Japan and attempt to find a way back home without altering Earth's future.
2005: Kashima and a large group of soldiers are transported back in time to stop a former military commander, also trapped in the past, from causing irreparable damage to Earth in the present day.
1979 version
1979: Iba (Chiba) and his crew had far fewer pieces of military hardware and limited ammunition. They had one helicopter, one tank and a few transport vehicles. They shot to kill when in danger as they were initially unaware of the time period they found themselves in, but soon found that to survive in the brutal warring states, they had to kill to live.
2005 version
2005: Mori and Kashima go back in time with an assortment of military vehicles and modern hardware including several tanks, a helicopter and a handful of personnel transports. Major Mori designs a special cellulose bullet that will not kill, but will also not leave any traces of their being in the past. Kashima is against this and asks why no live rounds. Mori stresses only in an emergency will they be allowed to use bullets for killing.
1979 version
1979: Iba and his dwindling crew attempt to get back home, but when this proves difficult, to impossible, they decide to try and adapt to the ways of the Feudal Era. Becoming samurai in the process, Iba takes on the persona of what would ultimately become lord Nobunaga Oda.
2005 version
2005: Kashima and his men are intentionally sent back in time to find his former commander, Colonel Matoba, who was thrust accidentally back to the Warring States Era and has been wrecking havoc that threatens the modern era of today. Once there, it is learned that Matoba has actually killed Nobunaga Oda and assumed his mantle.
1979 version
1979: Iba becomes great friends with an ambitious samurai commander, Kagetora, and both intend to rule Japan's past together.
2005 version
2005: Kashima becomes an uneasy ally with a samurai named Shichibei and both eventually take up arms side by side.
1979: While the film fluctuates between the past and present, the two eras are never shown to "co-exist" simultaneously; we only see the soldiers from modern times in the past. The scenes in the present day are brief and act as a parallel to the action occuring in the past, or to reflect on character exposition.
2005: Both modern and archaic eras collide in the new film; the past sees the future and vice versa. A lone samurai ends up in the modern age when Matoba and his men are thrust back in time. Shichibei first meets Kashima in the present day and both form an uneasy alliance till both eventually fight side by side in the past.
1979 version
1979: Iba and his crew eventually run out of both ammo and time in Feudal Japan. Sinking their tank in the ocean, their helicopter destroyed and only a few men among them, the sheer numbers of samurai and their "primitive" weapons have taken their toll on the modern military might of Japan's modern Self Defense Force.
2005 version
2005: Never at any time are the samurai's weapons a huge threat to the modern soldiers. The samurai themselves frequently take up arms with machine guns and high powered rifles. Colonel Matoba has also created a refinery to manufacture oil and the resources to make ammunition so there's never a threat of dwindling ammo or gas to run their helicopter.
1979: Iba's unit eventually splits into two groups. This second group is made up of soldiers who want to take advantage of the time period--rape, loot and kill wantonly without any consequence as per the lawlessness of the era. Iba and his group are not only at war with roving army of samurai, but with his own men.
2005: It's Kashima's group versus Matoba and his band of heavily armed samurai squadron. Matoba represents the awol soldier from the earlier film, but with a much bigger agenda than merely rampant robbing and killing.
1979 version
1979: The modern soldiers are feared for their military weaponry, but are used by guileful aids to the Shogunate to further their positions. When they're no longer needed, and their ammunition depleted, the Shogunate calls for their deaths.
2005 version
2005: Referred to as 'The Guides From Heaven', the modern militia are eventually revered for their superior weaponry and used for the advancement of the Japan of the Feudal Age, presenting a threat to the world of the future.
1979 version; Isao Natsuyagi pictured firing the arrow
1979: The film had two nominations at the Japanese Academy Awards--Best Sound and Best Supporting Actor for Isao Natsuyagi in 1980.
2005 version
2005: The film won Best Art Direction at the Asia-Pacific Film Festival in 2005.
86 minute International version of the 119 minute 2005 film:
Differences amount to around 34 minutes. Some scenes have been shuffled around including a scene between Kashima and Lt. Kanzaki which occurs earlier in the Japanese version. It's moved a few minutes ahead in the export print. A similar instance occurs during the finale. Shots of an approaching army are switched around in different places between the two cuts. At the end, a sequence with Shichibei, princess Nou and Tosuke is rearranged in the export cut.
There's a lot of flashback footage where Kashima remembers working under Colonel Matoba and his respect for the military commander. All of these are eliminated in the export version. A lengthy speech between the two prior to their duel at the end is also eliminated cutting straight to the fight.
Various scene extensions are removed such as several shots showing dead and rotted carcasses of samurai warriors. One trimmed scene shows the modern soldiers praying for their souls shortly after their arrival in the past.
Character interplay between several of the secondary characters is cut down extensively. Action scenes have also been trimmed slightly. The bulk of the truncated footage amounts to dialog exchanges that add more exposition. The scores are also vastly different between the Japanese cut and the international export version. The Japanese version features a somber and oddly less opulent soundtrack by a composer named 'Shezoo' while the export print features a loud and occasionally bombastic score credited to Mark Hannah. Incidentally, there's also a nice, melodic ballad that plays over the end credits in the Japanese version.
As a stand alone feature, Masaaki Tezuka's SAMURAI COMMANDO (export title) is a bit of a disappointment when compared to the original. Japanese science fiction fans may enjoy it (watch for Kazuki Kitamura, the main villain from the awful GODZILLA FINAL WARS as Shichibei), but those expecting lots of violence ported over from the Chiba version from 1979 will likely be disgruntled to find a fairly safe adventure tale peppered with some damn fine effects work. Sadly, even with all the characterization, relatively none of the players are very compelling. Takeshi Kaga is a fun comic book villain as Oda and Masato Ibu (another FINAL WARS alum) is amusing as Dohsan Saito. Japanese science fiction completists should check this out, but others may find it mildly distracting, but will likely forget about the whole thing shortly after they've finished the film. As much as I enjoy the work of Masaaki Tezuka, this is another case of a remake failing to surpass, or even be as good as the film it takes its inspiration from.
This review is representative of both the 86 minute export version on R3 DVD through IVL from Hong Kong and the Japanese R2 DVD that runs 119 minutes. Oddly enough, the R3 DVD is also non-anamorphic.
MANSON, MY NAME IS EVIL 2009 aka LESLIE, MY NAME IS EVIL
Kristen Hager (Leslie), Gregory Smith (Perry), Ryan Robbins (Charlie Manson), Kristin Adams (Dorothy)
Directed by Reginald Harkema
The Short Version: This mesmerizingly ambitious independent effort showcases a great deal of attention to detail including a satirically witty script that crams so much civic, political, religious and psychological banter in its engrossing 80 minute running time it would require a small book to contain it all. It's not perfect, but this Canadian production aims high and rarely misses its mark. A surprisingly accomplished, farcical horror based on one of the most notorious crimes in American history.

Perry, a man who has yet to find his identity among a time rife with war, assassinations and riots, ultimately falls for Leslie, a former cheerleader and homecoming princess who, after a few life altering experiences, finds herself one of the key members of the Manson clan of killers. Now a member of the jury trial against Leslie and her cohorts for the Manson murders, Perry battles with his carnal attraction to the lustful wiles emanating from Leslie's aura while the murderess herself struggles with how and why she has come to this point in life.
This Manson movie is as disturbingly American as apple pie. I say that because this simple low budget effort, burgeoning with creativity and ingenuity, erupts with style at regular intervals. It succeeds in detailing the savage cruelty of Manson and the followers he commanded to kill as well as capturing the decline of American society, eroded from its classic 50s/60s caricature painted by so many television programs and commercials of that time period.

In Harkema's apocalyptic vision of a crumbling and decadent America, there are a number of wars being waged--God and the Devil; the hypocrisy of the perceived white-bread family and the chaotic violence taking place at home and abroad; supporting one form of violence and decrying another; and also the psychological ramifications of ones dedication to religion whether to a "god", or to a devilishly messianic figure who takes on god-like proportions. There's also a heavy sexual subtext here between the character of Perry, his holy roller bride-to-be, Dorothy (she loves the lord more) and the lost soul that is Leslie.
Perry can barely contain his carnal desires and this is brought to the surface when he becomes a member of the jury against Leslie, but has a difficult time finding her guilty of her actions once he begins obsessing over her body. Earlier in the movie, while attempting to lure Perry into buying into her religious beliefs, Dorothy shows him a comic book detailing a young girl named Leslie bewitched by Satan disguised as a beatnik who gives her LSD sending her down a path to destruction.

Not only does Dorothy's preachy approach mirror events at the beginning and later in the movie, but it acts as a fascinating counterpoint between the propaganda spread through Christianity and the mock religious pandering of Charles Manson. Dorothy demands Perry "Make them pay", when referencing the upcoming jury trial of the devil's disciples. In the same breath, Charlie beckons his followers to do the same thing, to "Make the pigs pay". There are a number of other instances that are the same, but diametrically opposed to one another (especially the ending) that paint a devastating portrait of the fractured vision of society as we know it; the popular perception of "Good" in America and the "Evil" both within and outside it. If the visuals don't hammer home the films blazing, red hot message of a world gone wild, the soundtrack audibly conveys the manic horror around us.


The director tackles all these themes and ideas surprisingly well creating a mise en scene akin to NATURAL BORN KILLERS (1994). It falters a bit in the acting department. Some of the performers seem robotic in their delivery, but that may have been intentional. Ryan Robbins becomes noticeably more intense as the movie wears on, but then, this isn't really about Manson than it is about one of his followers. The film mainly centers around Leslie (based on the real life Manson murderess, Leslie Van Houten) and her fall from grace and her inner struggle to cope with all the chaos and confusion around her prior to her fateful day of bloody butchery. In a twisted bit of artistic license, Robbins also plays Leslie's father during the opening sequence. Later in the film after she has become a member of Manson's clan, he refers to himself as "her father" and even utters some of the same dialog her dad had spoken at the films beginning.

This Canadian horror-satire stirred the ire of infamous filth filmmaker, John Waters who publicly condemned the film. The real Leslie Van Houten being a friend of his, he apparently feels the film paints her in a bad light. It doesn't, however, but shows her to be a fragile woman who succumbed to "Satan" when "God" had seemingly abandoned her. Considering the real Van Houten took part in some of history's most notoriously sadistic murders (not to mention continuously stabbing the victims even after they were dead), I don't see how anyone could feel any pity for this person. Shockingly, a petition was started in the early 80s for Van Houten's parole, but this was later denied. Her subsequent attempts at gaining her freedom have also been denied. Van Houten is 61 years of age at this time.

Regarding this film, there's such an abundance of artistic flourishes, a little unknown picture like this is a breath of fresh air when compared with the languid, inexorably mundane movies that pass for horror these days. The film has an amazing visual style about it that belies what must have been a modest budget. The acting, as already mentioned, isn't the best you're likely to see, but some performances rotate between static, to engaging. Still, ones not entirely sure if this is down to the blackly satirical nature of the movie and its bizarrely humorous slant which will likely offend some viewers. Clearly Harkema is a talented filmmaker and this production is frequently a thought provoking affair constantly batting two opposing sides back and forth from one another like a cinematic tennis match.


Both sides are presented as one and the same. Normality isn't too far removed from insanity and both sides share equal screen time. On more than one occasion, dialog is spoken with the same amount of reverence whether being spouted by Perry's war mongering, racist father, or his bible thumping, "Jesus Loves Me" fiance, or the sinister allure of the maniac Charles Manson. It seems Harkema is trying to say society is mad; it doesn't matter which side of the fence you're on. Both society and the government approves of "Controlled Killing", but denounces and punishes killing detrimental to the betterment of the human race. Civilization is a mere facade of its true self, covered in a mire hiding the savage within all of us. Whether you've found God, or not, we're all animals inside; we all kill.

The original title of this picture was LESLIE, MY NAME IS EVIL, but was apparently changed to draw more attention to the more widely recognized name of the controversial Charles Manson. This production stands up well with the classic 1976 mini series, HELTER SKELTER (with a frightening portrayal of Manson by Steve Railsback) and the thoroughly brutal, nearly two decade long in the making THE MANSON FAMILY (began in 1988; released in 2004) from Jim Van Bebber. Reginald Harkema's movie avoids becoming too graphic and remains predominantly a character study cum cinematic political treatise. It's well worth checking out. It's a low budget surprise filled with socio-political allegory (Stick around for the end credits to hear Nixon's speech regarding the war in Vietnam), racism, views on capital punishment and other controversial subject matter that will likely stir any number of feelings in viewers in reference to the sheer volume of topics that populate this evocative, uncompromising and satirical horror film.
This review is representative of the Lionsgate DVD
copyright 2013. All text is the property of coolasscinema.com and should not be reproduced in whole, or in part, without permission from the author. All images, unless otherwise noted, are the property of their respective copyright owners.