Reel Bad Cinema: The Manster (1959/1962) review
THE MANSTER 1959/1962
Peter Dyneley (Larry Stanford), Satoshi Nakamura (Dr. Suzuki), Jane  Hylton (Linda Stanford), Terri Zimmern (Tara), Toyoko Takechi (Emiko  Suzuki), Kenzo Kuroki (Genji Suzuki), Jerry Ito (Superintendent Aida)
Directed by George Breakston and Kenneth G. Crane
The Short Version: Shameful  piece of American-Japanese exploitation  madness is easily one of the  sleaziest, most enjoyably awful pieces of  late 50s exploitation  nonsense ever conceived. The filmmakers refusal to  create a sympathetic  protagonist was a ballsy move for the time and the  blatant  extra-marital sex jabs is racy stuff for a trashy monster  picture that  aspires for little else than shock value. As inept as it  all is, the  film is a great deal of trashy fun and the sight of an  eyeball bulging  from a man's shoulder as well as a literal "split  personality" during  the closing moments is enough for drive in and late  night creature  feature lovers to do the MANSTER MASH all night long.

Larry  Stanford, a devoted reporter on assignment in Tokyo, interviews a   reclusive Japanese scientist regarding his experiments on the evolution   of man through cosmic rays, the mutation of the human species and other  pseudo  scientific jargon. While Larry shows a dedication to his job, he displays less of it towards his deteriorating marriage.   During the interview, the mad Dr. Suzuki drugs Stanford and injects him  with his murderously prehistoric hairy man concoction. Meanwhile, the  devious doctor dangles various prostitutes around Stanford including his  mysteriously alluring assistant, Tara all the while documenting the  gradual genetic changes occurring within Larry's body.

This  substantially sleazy US-Japan co-pro features a high level of trash   during its scant running time of 70+ minutes. The first five of those   is an astonishingly gruesome opener that crams in an assault on bathing   Japanese beauties slashed and mutilated by an ape monster, cages of   failed and maimed human experiments and a secret laboratory built around   a volcanic crater! Things slow down a bit till the last 15 minutes, but   these middle portion sequences consist of "character development" regarding the single  most despicable "tortured soul"  of the Larry Talbot variety you're  likely to ever see in a low budget  monster flick. In another nod to THE WOLFMAN (1941), our zero hero is  also named Larry!

The  script is especially lousy, but the finished product showcases such a   vast disregard for good taste and human decency that you won't give a   damn about how utterly ridiculous the whole thing is. The acting is   barely passable, but everything else is dangling a notch below (or  should that be above?)  an Ed Woodian level of absurdity. For some, that  will be a hearty  endorsement. The major male characters are laughable  caricatures of the  most uncivilized sort. For a scientist, Dr. Suzuki is essentially  the  equal of the Missing Link he seeks to extract from the forced   metamorphosis of a living subject. He displays a sadistic,   Frankensteinian level of blind ambition that the script fails to   capitalize on settling instead for the good doctors penchant for  chauvinistic evil and the prevalent sexual innuendo. He's the coldest,  lower level  scum whose grossly reprehensible actions fail to even  acknowledge  familial ties.

For  instance, we learn he used both his wife and his brother as human  guinea  pigs in experiments that went disastrously wrong leaving his  wife horribly  deformed, locked up in a cage and looking like a reject  from Eddie  Romero's BLOOD ISLAND series.  His brother is the  bloodthirsty apeman that massacres the spa bathing women during the  opener. Realizing he can't have a mad ape running around ripping people to pieces, the doctor has mercy on his now inhuman brother by gassing him prior to throwing him into the volcanic crater conveniently accessed by a metallic door in his lab. Suzuki wouldn't be a mad scientist without some outsized fauna  growing and surrounding his underfunded laboratory. Among the mutants,  you'll also spy bizarre plant life and gigantic, phallic shaped  mushrooms erupting from the ground.


Infidelity  is a major recurring theme here and one that crops up at  regular  intervals. Yet again the script fumbles a golden opportunity to  make a  conclusive parallel between Dr. Suzuki's serum that induces man's   repressed primitive sensibilities which in turn leads to rampant   perfidy. Instead, Suzuki's living, breathing test subject is an   unfaithful dirt bag from the very beginning. If the intention of the   filmmakers was to signify that it was the doctor's serum that made a   faithless, murderous, sex hungry monster out of our main protagonist,   the connection is poorly made. Stanford talks of working things out with   his wife, but instead decides to stay in Japan to work things out with  a  variety of geisha's including Suzuki's luscious assistant, Tara,  whom  we find out was previously a prostitute!

The  crudity of Stanford's behavior increases as he slowly begins to   change. Again, a chance to make the script more than mere exploitable   trash is wasted. Obviously he becomes more crazed and homicidal after   he's been injected with the serum, but his seedy, sexual impulses and   propensity for promiscuity were there all along. During the wild and   wooly conclusion, the filmmakers attempt to turn Stanford into a hero of   a sort, but by then, it's too late. Seeing him grow a whole other   monster faced noggin straight out of his shoulder prior to splitting   into two separate beings will make you forget all about any of the   potentially fascinating subtext the film wantonly squanders.

What  with all the less than tasteful nods to THE WOLFMAN (1941) and  FRANKENSTEIN (1931), the filmmakers also tip their hat to that jolly mad  slasher, Jack the Ripper. Once Larry garners a single hairy hand and a  watchful eyeball bulging from his right shoulder, he begins wandering  the streets at night strangling random women. This Japanese tinted White  Chapel murder plot point is quickly discarded a few minutes later once  Larry becomes a literal gruesome twosome not only sprouting a rubber  monster head, but his own visage turns noticeably ghoulish till the big  split during the triple climax. Yes, the film has three endings. The cops chase our Manster through a ship yard in what would appear to be the end. Realizing the mad doctor is still alive and well, after killing a handful of policemen, the Manster makes his way to Suzuki's lab for the perennial "fiery finale". That, too, would seem to be the end. Well, the police trace the Manster to the mountainside laboratory when a volcano conveniently erupts. Stanford goes ape shit and splits into two beings--his normal self and the other a hairy ape creature. They briefly duke it out till the real ending arrives, whereby our remaining protagonists utter some profound dialog before the picture fades to black. Whew!
Even with all the lovable low-grade nonsense on display,  the script actually yields some intriguing ideas such as man's repressed  dark side, genetic tampering and the struggle between devout  faithfulness versus a lack of fidelity in a fractured relationship.  Instead, the film prefers sensationalism and more than a few  infectiously goofy moments such as Larry the Letch climbing a mountain  in a  business suit and the mad Suzuki's laboratory is built over what  appears to be a string of several live  volcanoes!
Then there's the Japanese newspapers headlines that are  inexplicably printed out in  English and the moderately  lewd and  unbelievably foolish dialog exchanges peppered generously throughout.  However, had this mess  of a movie taken a more erudite path, it  wouldn't have been the  graceless, memorably tawdry kitsch klassic known  and loved by fabulous  50s fiends and those passionate for all things  unintentionally  hilarious. THE MANSTER is an undeniably memorable mush of madcap  monster madness for 'B' movie lovers....okay, 'C' movies.
 
 
 
          
      
 
 
copyright 2013. All text is the property of coolasscinema.com and should not be reproduced in whole, or in part, without permission from the author. All images, unless otherwise noted, are the property of their respective copyright owners.
  
4 comments:
haha, wonderful review!
well I definitely didn't like it as much as you did, although I definitely understand why you like it 'so much' :)
Yeah, its def a bad movie, but for its time, it has some heady ideas floating around in it!
Did you even watch this movie.
Yes. Have you?
Post a Comment