The Devils (1971) review
THE DEVILS 1971
Oliver Reed (Priest Urbain Grandier), Vanessa Redgrave (Mother Superior, sister Jeanne), Graham Armitage (Louie the XIII), Christopher Logue (Cardinal Richelieu), Dudley Sutton (Baron de Laubardemont), Gemma Jones (Madeline de Brou), Michael Gothard (Father Barre), Georgina Hale (Phillipe)
Directed by Ken Russell
"I pray that I may assist you in the birth of a new France where church and state...are one."
The Short Version: Controversial  filmmaker, Ken Russell, amassed critical hellfire and brimstone with  this incendiary, yet true account of a 17th century historical case of  alleged satanic possession. Incredibly offensive, THE DEVILS is a film  of vast social, political and religious importance. Oliver Reed acts his  heart out as the doomed martyr, Father Grandier, a surprisingly liberal  man of faith who finds himself at the center of political corruption,  religious defamation and object of revenge from a scorned, sexually  frustrated and misshapen mother superior. A visual feast from start to  finish, some will be in awe and others will be stunned by the shocking  imagery. While it's not for everybody, THE DEVILS is an important  cinematic document, a testament of a fiercely creative decade for a film  that could not be made today. Considering the treatment it still  receives from the very studio that financed it (Warner Brothers), the  underlying political and social subtext resonates strongly even today in  our current hysteria fueled and violent society.
***WARNING! This review contains nudity and images of a sensitive nature***

In  plague-ridden 17th century France, Urbain Grandier, a philandering  priest, lords over Loudun, a self contained provincial town within the  kingdom of Louie the XIII. The king, aided and abetted by the guileful  cardinal Richelieu, wishes to ensnare Loudun to gain total control over  the surrounding lands. While the city enjoys its independence, decadence  is alive and well within the barred monastic walls of the Ursuline  convent. The blasphemy within Loudun reaches its apex when the misshapen  Mother Superior, sister Jeanne, learns that Grandier, whom she secretly  and sexually covets, has privately married Madeline de Brou, one of the  convents nuns. Sister Jeanne then conspires with the Cardinal and Baron  Laubardemont to accuse Grandier of his alleged satanic association that  has resulted in the purported possession of the convents followers. A  mass exorcism erupts in a farcical explosion of sexual depravity  ensuring the baron and the vengeful, hunchbacked mother superior  successfully discredit Grandier implicating him as the devil's disciple.
"Your humiliation is nothing! If god wants you to suffer...than you...should want to suffer...and accept that suffering gladly!"

Ken  Russell's controversial classic has remained largely unseen since its  original release some 40 years ago acquiring a far reaching vilification  that few films have ever attained. One similar example of a film that  shook the foundation of its studio and the patrons and critics who saw  it is Tod Browning's FREAKS  (1932). However, Russell's picture didn't just strike a nerve with its  financial backers, critics and audiences, it summarily raped them into  oblivion with one scene of sexual madness after another in its depiction  of a depraved, morally corrupt society. It's made all the more  incendiary in that it's based on documented accounts that took place in  the historical Loudun in 17th century France.

Truth  can sometimes be more outrageous than fiction and Russell's most  notorious film redefines the word with its unabashed scenes of human  cruelty, psycho-sexuality and outright bizarre behavior. Some viewers  may find it hard to believe that such events and actions could have  taken place as it's understandably difficult to fathom that we  as human beings in a civilized society can behave as savages. A similar  controversy befell Ralph Nelson's SOLDIER BLUE  (1970), which featured an incredibly sadistic finale wherein a US  cavalry unit mercilessly tortured and slaughtered innocent Native  American men, women and children. Even today, despite the unbelievable brutality being documented, it's hard to swallow that man could act out in such a manner. Such deplorable travesties occurred again in WW2 with  the Nazis and Japan's genocidal missions to exterminate the Jews and the  Chinese respectively. Even in our modern climate, we as a civilized people "co-mingle" in  an uncharacteristically animalistic fashion. Unfortunately, little has changed over the  last several hundred years.
"Now there's a man well worth goin' to hell for, eh?!"

For  the time period in which THE DEVILS takes place, religion is something  to be revered, feared and twisted and maimed for political purposes,  often with diabolically tragic results. Russell's movie operates on  multiple levels- as an historical work, a political statement and also  as a powerful diatribe about religion (including catholicism versus protestants)  and the ways in which it was/is used to control and or manipulate the  lives of those with faith, whether strong willed, or weak-minded. The  centerpiece of all this is Urbain Grandier played to perfection by  Oliver Reed in an exemplar performance wherein he explores every emotion  imaginable before making the audience wince during the disturbingly  heartrending finale. If you're a fan of Oliver Reed, this is easily  among his best work, if not the best, surrounded by the most sumptuous  scenery with which to chew magnanimously.

Reed  as Grandier is viewed as something of a saint, but also a sinner,  freely cavorting with several women while being uncharacteristically  lusted after by seemingly every female within Loudun's walls. One  devout, sex hungry admirer of Grandier is the hunchbacked, and quite mad  sister Jeanne, the mother superior of the Ursuline nuns. So potent is  sister Jeanne's attraction to the priest, she fantasizes about him as  Christ. Removing himself from the cross he has been crucified upon,  bloody lashes and all, she begins to lovingly lick and kiss his wounds  prior to making love to him. Her desire for this man, whose affection  has been given to numerous others, consumes her, pushing her to the  brink of madness; the outer reaches of which have already seen her  frequent visitation in her self-vilification of her own physical  abnormality. Of course, the mother superior's sins do not go unpunished  as she indulges in self-flagellation for her penance.
"These raving women are possessed of devils, I take it?"

What  with this borderline sociopathic nun obsessing dangerously about an  already sexually active man of the cloth, a dandy-ish dictator (who enjoys dressing protestants up as black birds and gunning them down as they run across his yard)  collaborating with a calculating cardinal to overtake Grandier's  self-governing township, the stage is set for tragedy of monumentally  manic proportions. It's during the latter part of the film where much of  the controversial material is present. A kinkily insane witch hunter is  summoned to exorcise the possessed nuns utilizing methods of torture  including forced enemas culminating in a spectacularly over the top orgy  that has the libidinous ladies literally swinging from the ceiling.  While one is seen feverishly stroking overly large candles, the wax  oozing down the "shaft", a  group of naked nuns take down a statue of Christ and sexually desecrate  it; the latter act having never been included in any print of the film.
 
  Not in the film, snippets of the 'rape of Christ' appear in the HELL ON EARTH documentary.
Warner  Brothers, the studio that financed the film, has objected to the  reinstatement of the sequence into the picture even to this day. The  controversial sequence did find its way into a documentary on THE DEVILS  that aired on British television in 2002, but has since been returned  to the vaults. The documentary is part of this BFI 2 disc DVD, but the 'Rape of Christ' sequence  is only seen in snippets. Interviews with catholic clergymen do not see  the scene as blasphemy, but apparently the studio feels otherwise.  Actually, Russell's film is most assuredly not for everybody and  doubtless a good many religious followers will be wholeheartedly  offended by what is showcased throughout the 107 minutes of the film in  what amounts to the most complete official version to be released thus  far.
  Not in the film, a portion of this scene is present in the HELL ON EARTH documentary.
Phallic symbolism are among the offensive delights  found within THE DEVILS, such as a brainwashed nun furiously stroking a  large candle, or another masturbating with a burned leg bone. Sadly, the  latter example is one of the scenes unaccounted for on this glorious  DVD presentation due yet again to the nervousness of Warner Brothers.  It's a scene during the finale wherein Redgrave's sex crazed character  diddles herself with a charred bone of Grandier. Kissing the bulbous end  of the shaft simulating testicles, she then inserts the broken and  burned piece of penile pleasure into her vaginal regions finally  enjoying Grandier's "love" in the way she never could when he was alive. A portion of this sequence is present in the Hell On Earth documentary on disc 2.
"These  priests are depraved! It is they who are guilty of sacrilege...she has  been deliberately provoked by the priests...they have desecrated god's  house with this blasphemous spectacle!"

Aside  from its numerous scenes of religious corruption and appalling sexual  proclivities, THE DEVILS contains a social subtext that is relevant  today reminding us all that civilization never seems to learn its own  history lessons regardless of how many times they are repeated, nor how  much violence and decadence that is born from man's ignorance. Michael  Gothard (horror fans may remember him from SCREAM & SCREAM AGAIN [1969])  is incredible as the theatrically bonkers charlatan priest, Father  Barre. Much like the sham Snake Oil Salesmen throughout history leading  up to the Faux Faith Healers of the 80s who used their "craft"  to steal away the life savings from the gullible while leading secret  lives of debauchery, Barre uses his gift of gab in the most deranged  fashion to profane religious iconography. There's even a scene where the  transvestite king Louie, disguised as a Duke, visits the Ursuline  convent and craftily exposes Barre for the counterfeit clergyman he  really is. It's too late, though, as the brainwashing is complete and  Barre's "technique" proves to be a grievous success.
"...and with the security of our independence gone, our freedoms would go, too!"

The  political ramifications seen here mirror much of the current turbulent  situation in America right now and act as a view into a possible future  should certain socialist agendas prevail. The loss of Loudun's freedom  and independence, the subjugation and indoctrination of the Ursuline  nuns and the silencing and wrongful accusation of Loudun's leader and  signifying voice perverted by an oppressive dictatorship reflects the  current state of affairs in the United States. It's intriguing to watch  this true account brought to bear through the eyes of Ken Russell under  the realization that little, if anything has changed in terms of how  power is exuded, usurped, or taken away through deceptively evil means.  THE DEVILS are not demonic spirits possessing the flesh of innocent  souls. THE DEVILS are man and the evil that resides within us all.
I  would be remiss if I didn't mention the magnificent set design by Derek  Jarman, stunning in its construction. Bearing an almost futuristic  look, the monolithic, ceramic styled buildings are incredibly impressive  and rival any such design as you'd find in the most current production,  no doubt "built" inside a computer of all things.
While I am unfamiliar with the bulk of Russell's resume (his LAIR OF THE WHITE WORM finds him revisiting similarly offensive religious imagery),  THE DEVILS (1971) is simply a brilliant film not just of the 1970s, but  of all time. It's proof yet again of this bygone, turbulent decade  excreting a savage creativity and controversial ferocity that, in the  case of this production from director Ken Russell, has stood the test of  time; slowly amassing a level of respectability that eluded it upon its initial release.
This review is representative of the BFI R2 DVD 2 disc set.
 
 
 
 
          
      
 
 
copyright 2013. All text is the property of coolasscinema.com and should not be reproduced in whole, or in part, without permission from the author. All images, unless otherwise noted, are the property of their respective copyright owners.
  
12 comments:
I've always wanted to see this one, but it has never made it's way to dvd, too bad Warner Bros. hasnt done it. I love Ken Russell's films and have watched the majority of them but I'll be honest, this is THE one I want to check out.
I love films dealing with religion, Russell's films have always explored this theme in one way or another. Hell, even in Altered States we see some religious imagery, one of which is a crucified man with a goat head that has six eyes!
Great review of a film I hope will some time see the light of day. I gotta tell you, I find it fascinating that a studio finds a film that they funded so offensive that they wont release it. I mean, Russell really did something here!
Another plus: Oliver Reed! I love this actor, he is always so intense, a pity I haven't had a chance to check out what could quite possibly be his best work.
It's on DVD now, Fran. At the bottom I cited the review was using the region 2 dvd from the UK as the source. It's a 2 disc set and the most complete OFFICIAL release available so far. The ball is in WB's court as to a blu ray and more complete version. Here's a link where I got it from, but you can also order it from amazonUK, whichever is closest to you. This movie is definitely one you should see, my friend!
http://www.diabolikdvd.com/category/Art-House-Favorites/Devils-DVD-%28Ken-Russell%29-%28PAL-Region-2%29.html
Had a VHS of The Devils about a dozen years ago, lent it to someone who promptly moved away, but did see it and was properly awestruck even by a censored version. It's definitely Reed's greatest performance that I've seen and one of the great portraits of the mass hysteria any ideology might generate.
Definitely agree with you, Sam!
I should also mention that this UK release is the original X version that played in theaters there back in the 70s. It's longer than the US version which was edited further for violence and nudity.
Thanks for the link dude!
A great movie. Not a movie about religion, but a movie about power.
It's worth mentioning that it's based on a book by Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World. Ken Russell's ideas were as complex and misunderstood as Huxley's.
"and act as a view into a possible future should certain socialist agendas prevail."
A very good point. Hysteria is always dangerous, whether it's motivated by religion, Marx or political correctness.
@ D: Hello, my friend. Yes, I'm aware of the book and the play, but it seems every write up and article talks about it and I figured I'd just leave it out. I agree with you about the notion of power, but I do think religion is a strong force in the film, the power of religion, that is. The new DVD is a worthy purchase if you haven't gotten it yet.
"and act as a view into a possible future should certain socialist agendas prevail."
I'd say it acts as a view into a possible future should certain agendas advocating the fusion of church and state prevail in this country. I'm surprised you didn't mention that in your fine write up.
I do think I touched on that near the beginning. But we are currently experiencing something similar (at least from my point of view) with the government meddling in religion (in addition to everywhere else); which is what Separation of Church and State is supposed to keep a wall between.
I don't see government attempting to meddle in religion so much as religion attempting to meddle in government. There is absolutely no place for religion in government whatsoever, and for me, THE DEVILS is a vivid depiction of what can happen (and did) when religion infects government.
You'll need to give me some examples so I'll know what you're referring to.
Post a Comment