Showing posts with label Heroes of Horror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heroes of Horror. Show all posts

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Heroes of Horror: New Blood & Old Hats Part 4

HALLOWEEN WITH JOHN CARPENTER & OTHER THINGS THAT GO BUMP IN THE FOG

John Carpenter may be the only director having worked in the horror genre who could rip off concepts and ideas and make them look uniquely his own. One could argue Carpenter's career mirrors that of Quentin Tarantino in that it's generously dotted with works that homage what others have done before him; only Carpenter has done it with far more polish and professionalism.

Like most of the genres old hands, his work has lost much of its luster with only an occasional shiny diamond amongst the coal. Personally, I consider John Carpenter one of horrors greatest filmmakers. His decline is no different than any other revered director that specialized in other genres whether within or without the realm of horror and fantasy. His inspirations are debatable, but it's doubtful many of horrors current crop of hipsters behind the camera will ever attain the depth of Carpenter's resume, or any of horror's old hats for that matter.


His SOMEONE'S WATCHING ME! was a 1978 TV movie starring Lauren Hutton that mimicked Hitchcock as well as Bob Clark's seminal and downbeat BLACK CHRISTMAS (1974); the latter film bearing a connection with Carpenter.

There's no arguing the Master of Horror will always be best remembered for HALLOWEEN (Carpenter with Tony Moran as Michael Meyers above). Also from 1978, Carpenter's forever duplicated stalk and slasher borrowed much from Clark's equally classic, if less discussed outing. HALLOWEEN's classic status is assured, yet the background regarding BLACK CHRISTMAS, the film itself, and its then proposed sequel, which eventually morphed into HALLOWEEN, cannot be denied.

Carpenter's THE FOG (1979), an incredibly moody little ghost story has finally gotten the respect it has long deserved. Still, whether intentional, or not, Carpenter's tale of a ghost ship and maggot ridden pirate corpses borrows elements from both Amando De Ossorio's RETURN OF THE BLIND DEAD (1972) and THE GHOST GALLEON (1973). The former in its 100 Bicentennial celebration wherein the monsters come back for revenge, and the latter in its fog enshrouded ghost ship.

ASSAULT ON PRECINCT 13 (1977) is a horror tinged version of NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1968) that depicts a group of varied individuals locked up inside a police station threatened by a murderous, bloodthirsty gang trying to get to them from the outside. Elements of this film would later turn up in Carpenter's mostly maligned GHOSTS OF MARS from 2001. The directors career is also dotted with remakes, some of which are striking in their imagery and ability to instill fear in the viewer.

Such is the case with THE THING from 1982; a film that expands on its origins less from the 1951 THE THING FROM ANOTHER WORLD than from the original John W. Campbell Jr. story. This tale about an alien frozen in the Arctic that escapes and uses human hosts to survive by absorbing them and moving onto other lifeforms still contains incredible effects work and taut direction from Carpenter.

His other remake, VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED (1995), is a mostly pedestrian effort that seems to show its director merely collecting a paycheck. Then again, very little of consequence emerged in horror from the late 80s to the mid 1990s.


ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK (1981) is still an incredible piece of action cinema with a streamlined comic book plot. Carpenter essentially remade the film in 1996 as ESCAPE FROM LA, bolstering the bigger budgeted movie with tons of action set pieces and cult film icons. Wedged in between were films about killer cars (CHRISTINE), a kung fu fantasy feature (BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA), an alien invasion movie (THEY LIVE) and a devil picture (PRINCE OF DARKNESS) that has increased in value over the years.

His MEMOIRS OF AN INVISIBLE MAN (1992) disappeared at the box office and VAMPIRES (1998) was essentially an Earth bound version of 2001's GHOSTS OF MARS but with bloodsuckers.

Carpenter has professed his love of westerns and according to him, he considers a hefty chunk of his resume to be westerns in disguise. His most recent directed work, THE WARD (2010), a traditional ghost story set within a mental institution, has been heralded by many to be a return to form for one of horror's Big Guns.


While Craven made his name on visceral violence, Romero on zombies and their flesh eating social subtext, Carpenter made his on tension and a profound knack for goosebumpery. Like all of the genres major players, their best days are behind them. No matter what they do from here on out, those classic early works will always be there to see time and time again. Remakes be damned.

THE STAKES ARE HIGH


Jim Mickle's MULBERRY STREET (2006) had an interesting 'B' movie plot, but a lousy execution. It was part of the 2007 After Dark Horrorfest and delivered far more Horr-ible than Horror.

Upon stumbling upon his STAKE LAND (2010) via a blind buy, the results are like night and day. They don't even appear to be the work of the same man. The plots are similar, but the 2010 picture, about a zombie-like plague that turns Earth's population into ravenous vampire monsters, is the DAWN OF THE DEAD (1978) of the new millennium.

Hopefully, the wonderfully gloomy atmosphere and didacticism of civilizations destruction disguised as a vampire apocalypse isn't a fluke on Mickle's part. His film also makes vampires creepy again.

Is Kelly McGillis (seen above with Mickle) becoming a late-blooming scream queen? She has a soul searing role here as a nun on the run who ultimately struggles with her faith. Incidentally, she also has a role in Ti West's THE INNKEEPERS (2011), another filmmaker also a part of this article. Horror heroine, the lovely Danielle Harris (at left) is also featured here.

No glittery gayisms and romanticisms seen in the teeny-bopper interpretations of bloodsuckers in recent years, these are no-nonsense, rip your head off vamps with zombie-istic tendencies. It remains to be seen if Mickle can capitalize on the momentum gained by this stunning horror film that was among the best I saw in 2011.

I BLESS THE RAINS AND THE ZOMBIES DOWN IN AFRICA


Howard and Jonathan Ford's THE DEAD (2010) seemed to come out of nowhere; much like the shuffling dead seen almost non-stop over the course of this sweltering, Africa lensed motion picture. The plot is simplicity in its depiction of two men of different races, nationalities, but desiring the same goal--to be reunited with their loved ones. It's not a perfect film, but it's brimming with tense moments and overflowing with a lava-like level of zombie attacks.

The various assaults and locales recall Italian gut-slurpers like Fulci's classic ZOMBIE (1979) and Mattei's classless HELL OF THE LIVING DEAD (1980). It mirrors the apocalyptic bravado of Mickle's STAKE LAND, but trumps it slightly by shooting on the devastating African continent. The frequently stunning photography somehow takes away some of the horror, yet lends the film a gruesomely majestic feel at the same time. It remains to be seen if the Ford's are game to give gore another go-round.

SHARKS CAN BE SCARY AGAIN AND THAT'S NO CROC

With the 'Found Footage' and BLAIR WITCH styled horror thrillers being all the rage (right alongside remakes, the current bane of horror), Australian filmmaker, Andrew Traucki joins his other 'Down Under' compatriots as a force to be reckoned with.

Surfacing with the Killer Kroc flick BLACK WATER in 2007, Traucki has shown himself to be an ardent fan of 'Nature Amuck' movies. So far his two completed features are of the aquatic menace variety. BLACK WATER, which takes after the similar US film, OPEN WATER (2006), eschews that movies sharks for crocodiles, but retains the 'based on true events' moniker.

BLACK WATER's premise was simple--a vacation goes horribly awry leaving a family stranded within the Australian swampland and being stalked by a hungry crocodile. It's slowly paced, but Traucki punctuates his movie with a few stellar moments of shock. He also proves distinctive by utilizing a unique method for his films. As opposed to the prolificity of CGI, Traucki opts instead to composite real crocodiles for the attack scenes.

He used this same technique for his next feature, the even better THE REEF (2010). This film (even more similar to OPEN WATER), about a group of vacationers being hunted by a great white shark after their boat capsizes, did something few shark movies have done since JAWS--induce a feeling of fear. OPEN WATER did it, but that film was of the BLAIR WITCH school of horror.

THE REEF feels more like a real movie jettisoning the 'you are there' approach taken by so many horror pictures in recent memory. This films ad campaign is one of the best I've seen to come along in a good many years.

Sadly, this picture had its premiere on DVD; the theatrical front for killer shark movies having been systematically decimated by the double team foul fishy smell emanating from DEEP BLUE SEA (1997) and countless SyFy Shitters of the Week.

The box office failure of the imbecilic SHARK NIGHT 3D (2011) and the limited release of the semi horror DARK TIDE (2011) starring Halle Berry did nothing to re-ignite the dangers indigenous to oceanic locales; the likes of which haven't been incurred on a large scale since JAWS way back in 1975.

At least in Traucki's case, he invoked genuine menace and a paranoid sense of isolation with his two underwater horrors which lacked the bigger, flashier budgets of the American made fare.

Currently, Traucki is attached to the curious THE ABCs OF DEATH, an unusual movie bringing together some two dozen genre filmmakers and their visions. Here's hoping Traucki continues to scare in an equally ingenious vein as he has done in his first two features.

LUCKY WITH THE LADIES TEN YEARS RUNNING

For a decade now, Lucky McKee has been associated with the horror genre. He's done relatively few films, as they've been spread out between 2002 and 2010. He attracted a good deal of attention with MAY (2002), his grim psychological terror tale of Frankensteinian proportions starring Angela Bettis. In that film, Bettis was this societally disconnected girl whose "best friend" is a peculiar looking doll. After losing relationships with a man then a lesbian woman, May continues full speed ahead into insanity; not that she was too far away from the brink as it was.

McKee then helmed what many say is the best, or one of the best of cable's hit series, MASTERS OF HORROR with his episode, 'Sick Girl'; yet another tale of lonely, detached females with the inclusion of an exotic, yet dangerous insect. He next delved into Argento territory with the SUSPIRIA sounding THE WOODS in 2006. Unfortunately, I haven't seen it.

McKee next adapted the Jack Ketchum novel, 'Red' for the silver screen. This one wasn't so much a horror picture as it was a grueling dramatic thriller via the violence laden conventions of the revenge film. Any horror fan worth their salt on the wound will know who Jack Ketchum is. The rampant perversity and recalcitrance of Ketchum's ball busting endurance tests were a natural fit for McKee's demoralized and homocidal central characters. For RED, this was something of a departure for both Ketchum and McKee, yet the violence was still shocking in the extreme.


The plot of RED concerns an old man who is harassed by a group of kids with nothing better to do with their day than terrorize an old man fishing with his dog. These cruel bastards kill the man's dog with his own shotgun for no reason whatsoever.

From here, the film trots out the required tropes of vengeance cinema and builds appropriately robust heroes and villains along the way. As disturbing as it all is, the movie ends on an upbeat note.


It's worth noting McKee seems attracted to characters (predominantly women) who are outcasts, quirky and or homicidal; sometimes a combination of the three. His films mirror the eccentricities that propagate within Ketchum's twisted worlds.

This was really brought to bear in McKee's most recent endeavor, THE WOMAN (2011). Here was a film that was as grossly offensive as it was mesmerizingly engrossing. Its depiction of McKee's most bizarre and intrinsically savage characterizations yet are spearheaded by Pollyanna Mcintosh (see photo at right).

This was a sequel to an inferior movie entitled OFFSPRING (2009). It, too, was based on a Ketchum novel. Pollyanna Mcintosh lead the cannibalistic pack in that film but goes it solo here. THE WOMAN is superior in every way to OFFSPRING, yet this sequel is also a terribly divisive amongst horror circles. It's one of those movies you either admire or despise. It's also one of a trend that shows an unbridled devotion to 70s ultra violent cinema, only here, the material is approached with more intelligence than the average picture of this sort. Me, personally, I look forward to what McKee has planned next.

THE BOTTOMLESS BARREL: REDNECK ROB VS. UWE'S BOLL SHIT

This rocker with the initials RZ sings what passes for mainstream metal these days. He also directs what he feels are potential masterpieces being passed off as mainstream horror. He's so cognizant of his place in horror's universe that his movies bear the distinction of having his name plastered just above the main title a la John Carpenter. You'd think justification for one's accomplishments would come with experience and a varied resume.

So far, Mr. Zombie has amassed a small number of movies that are virtually interchangeable from the one before it. The (lowest) common denominators between them are carnivalesque characters acted by familiar genre faces who utter the most infantile dialog ever devised. If you can imagine Tarantino as a 15 year old hillbilly, you have some idea of the sort of dialog Robbie Z writes for his cast to spout with the utmost conviction (Chicken fucking anyone?). It's like everyone in his movies live in an alternate reality where human beings do not behave like rational human beings.

He's done two mediocre TEXAS CHAINSAW homages and two HALLOWEEN films which could easily be related to his maiden and sophomore (sophomoric?) efforts. Zombie's interpretation of Carpenter's genre defining classic is about as pleasant an experience as drinking a gallon of curdled milk. And it's only getting worse as Zombie puts the finishing touches on what is no doubt yet another waste of celluloid, this time titled (in oppressively creepy voice) LORDS OF SALEM. Wait, correction, that's ROB ZOMBIE'S LORDS OF SALEM. Excuse me. Zombie obviously loves violent movies of the 70s, but he should really put the pen down and let somebody from this planet (and with a mature grasp of the English language) write his scripts for him. A change of scenery would do him good, too.

For the last twenty years few directors have garnered such an impressive array of shitty movies as Uwe Boll, the not so wunderkind from Germany.

To compensate for Boll's cinematic shortcomings, I will include some juicy photos of Kristanna Loken and Natassia Malthe, two beautiful women who donned the skin tight leather outfits of the increasingly insipid BLOODRAYNE series.

His story is an amazing one and could easily qualify for a novel sized read. The sheer audacity this man has in his quest to half-ass direct one motion picture after the other is a staggering accomplishment in itself. And one of the more amazing aspects of this modern day Ed Wood (while Wood is beloved for his badness, Boll is infinitely hated by cult film fans) is that he has a small contingent of fans who admit to liking his movies.

Not only that, but the man continues to get financing to craft his crapola that are the equivalent of used toilet paper. And not the expensive kind. I'm talking finger roll here. And yes, that's the man pictured above giving you the finger. He makes continuously craptacular movies gambling with others money whom blindingly fork it over to him, yet he can't grasp he should lay the camera down and smash it to bits in the hopes of never picking one up again.

Thankfully, studios ultimately became a bit more hesitant to willingly hand over a budget to this guy considering his movies consistently tank at the box office. Bear in mind that tanking is an understatement. Boll's movies burn through the bottom of the barrel like so much Alien blood yet he still possesses some arcane ability to wrangle big name Hollywood talent (past and present); this despite each film descending further and further into the abyss where celluloid excrement goes to die.

Boll, having somewhat tired of his ruthless video game to screen fetish (tired by a narrow margin), resorted to blatant offensiveness to attract a crowd with POSTAL, a 2007 comedy that makes Troma look like Mel Brooks by comparison. He achieved a modicum of success with this cinematic shit pot by stirring up a lot of folks via mainstream media news reports because of some imagery mocking 9/11 and comedic material involving Osama Bin Laden and George Bush.

Every movie on his Boll call has been a disaster and none on quite the level of IN THE NAME OF THE KING: A DUNGEON SIEGE TALE (2007), a 60 million bomb of an epic scale. The movie couldn't even be bothered to break the 5 million mark in American theaters. It also failed to kill off the career of the charismatic Jason Statham, a British actor whose own career is of equal amazement. I can't think of another actor who can be in multiple movies a month and relatively few of them make any money; and yet he still gets good roles.


Meanwhile, Boll continues to churn out rotten saurkraut; still resorting to cheap shocks (like his no doubt horrific AUSHWITZ from 2011) when nobody is paying attention to his juvenile video game movies. Obviously, a market exists for this man's manure; particularly BLOODRAYNE considering Boll has been behind three of them thus far. The mind boggles and the head hurts.

WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED?

WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO GREG MCLEAN?! The man exploded onto the horror scene with a down and dirty endurance horror by the name of WOLF CREEK in 2005. It was a movie of the 'Based On True Events' school of horror and told in a suitably savage, bleak style.

McLean wisely spends a good deal of time with his three Australian campers just prior to their fateful meeting with the films nasty villain portrayed by John Jarratt. The director pulls no punches in its terror and torture sequences leading up to a shocking, if ambiguous ending.

Despite being a financial success, audiences were divided here because it took too long to get to the "action". Hollywood has programmed the paying customers that you must cut to the chase and get to the action as quickly as possible instead of building to it. To hell with things like exposition. Unless you have an established star for folks to ogle, most audience members can't be bothered with actors they are not familiar with. McLean was brave enough to fashion the film his way and managed to get a nationwide release and a tidy profit resulted.

His follow up, ROGUE (2007), is a beyond exceptional entry in the 'Nature Amuck' genre that has been abused and damaged so severely by the SyFy Channel, that these types of movies seem totally out of place being seen in a theatrical format.

Every time it's tried, the films fail to make a decent profit versus budget. The high profile, yet low brow trash of PIRANHA (2010) is a good example of this. McLean's ROGUE deserved a theatrical chance.

Just take a look at its poster artwork; a terrifying design that recalls the iconic JAWS poster imagery. Yet it was highly likely his tale of crocodile horror would sink to the murky bottom of the swamp like the others before and after it.

Regardless, McLean devises a well rounded blotter of diverse characters, bombastic cinematography and intense attacks by the title critter. Gore is kept to a minimum. It took ROGUE a long time before it hit American shores, unfortunately.

No doubt its release was hampered by another killer crocodile movie, the vastly inferior PRIMEVAL (2007). That film was based on a true story, but it failed to ignite at the box office. Movies about man-eating alligators and crocodiles generate poor monetary returns and ROGUE was dealt a death blow in its native Australia. It's one of those times where a film was unfairly overlooked and maligned from a piss poor audience reception. It's much better than its theatrical performance would reflect.

McLean has been MIA these last few years, but here's hoping this fiercely talented director gets back in the game sooner rather than later.


WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO TI WEST?! Actually, Ti West may not actually belong here. I haven't seen his 2005 picture, THE ROOST, but HOUSE OF THE DEVIL (2009) was infinitely impressive, packed with tension and possessing a flair that echoed the horror of the 1980s. The title is pretty much self-explanatory about a woman who applies for a babysitting job to make some quick cash. She ends up with far more than she could have ever bargained for. What came next from Mr. West almost seems to be from a different director entirely.

CABIN FEVER 2 (2009) is easily one of the worst horror films I've ever seen. Apparently Ti West is embarrassed by his involvement with this picture and such ignominy felt by his involvement is understandable considering how wretched the whole thing is. The film isn't without some striking moments, but for the most part, it's forgettable junk that only spirals downward the closer we get to the ending. In his defense, this was a severely troubled production being shelved for a time before being released; and it shows.

After that fiasco, West embarked on another suspense building spooker, this one entitled THE INNKEEPERS (2011). This story of two co-workers who are bound and determined to make some sort of spiritual connection with the Inn's former tenants... who happen to be very much dead. The movie attempts to ape the slow build formula of West's HOUSE OF THE DEVIL, but fails at generating much in the way of horror till the finale. It's not a bad film, just an anemic attempt at emulating Kubrick's THE SHINING (1980) and any number of British horror from decades prior.

His upcoming V/H/S promises to be something truly terrifying and among the already flooded 'Found Footage' market; the popularity of which doesn't seem to have slowed down much if at all. West also appears among the lengthy list of filmmakers attached to the ambitious THE ABCs OF DEATH.

WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO NEIL MARSHALL?! British born director Neil Marshall got a deluge of positive notices from his monster movie, DOG SOLDIERS, a 2005 film that bears all the hallmarks of a SyFy Channel original. Not surprisingly, the US channel well known for its awful CGI monster fests adopted this British tale of lycanthropic terror for American consumption. While this story of gun toting soldiers fending off a family of werewolves from within a flimsily fortified cabin in the woods offered a few scares and lots of blood, it was Marshall's next that really put him on the map.

A group of women go on a cave excursion within an unmapped cave and become trapped below ground with no known means of escape. The women quickly realize they're not alone. The darkness surrounding them yields fanged, albino like, flesh-eating humanoids. With their numbers dwindling, the women must find both a way to survive and a way out before they all become food for these blind beasts from below. THE DESCENT (2007) was a welcome breath of fresh air for the horror genre which had (and continues to be) inundated with lackadaisacal remakes and hollow throwbacks to better films of yesteryear. The scares were plentiful and successfully pulled off. A Marshall produced sequel followed in 2009. I have no idea what happened with Marshall's next picture.


Instead of capitalizing on his horror growth spurt from his two previous movies, Marshall regressed with a terribly ill advised post apocalyptic watzit entitled DOOMSDAY (2008) starring Kate Beckinsale lookalike, Rhona Mitra (pictured above). Surely made with the best of intentions, Marshall received generally scornful notices from fans and critics alike who were blown away by THE DESCENT.

To put it mildly, I found DOOMSDAY to be an abomination. It has all the trimmings for grand cult appeal amassing everything from ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK (1981) to THE ROAD WARRIOR (1981) to ALIENS (1986) and even Lenzi's NIGHTMARE CITY (1980); yet it totally flushes such an opportunity due in no small part to some severely erratic, headache inducing editing.

Marshall was pretty much off the radar after this misguided Armageddon fiasco, but found a modest degree of redemption with the gory sword and sandal set CENTURION (2010).

Years in the making, this historical epic obviously meant a lot to director Marshall considering the level of realism and shooting tactics incorporated for its reportedly grueling schedule in the Scottish Highlands. A far cry from the absurdities of DOOMSDAY, CENTURION came in the wake of 300 (2007), which opened the Olympian gates for a peplum resurgence that hadn't been seen since the 1950s and 60s.

For whatever reason, no major studio would touch CENTURION. Magnet Releasing ended up distributing Marshall's movie with a 'barely there' release till the inevitable video debut. I do have to wonder, though, had DOOMSDAY performed better, would the vastly superior CENTURION have gotten the respectable stateside release it deserved and from a company more willing to gamble on a wider berth.


Whatever Marshall's next happens to be (he's attached as director to the horror film THE LAST VOYAGE OF DEMETER), he's shown himself to be a devoted filmmaker and lover of the medium who seems to honestly care about the product he is creating. The best of luck to him and to the others listed here.

To be continued in HEROINES OF HORROR, a fifth chapter dealing with horror and trash cinemas female helmsmen.

***ALL IMAGES: GOOGLE IMAGES***

Monday, February 20, 2012

Heroes of Horror: New Blood & Old Hats Part 3


SAWS & THE SUPERNATURAL

While the French fear filmmakers who migrated to North American shores have been confined, or sentenced to remake purgatory--denied of their dark originality that brought them here in the first place--others have shown a good deal of promise. James Wan is a Malaysian born filmmaker who exploded onto the horror scene with the intriguing SAW (2004), the first in the massively popular franchise. Horror series' have become a popular trend that has intermittently emerged and hibernated since the 1930s. From the Dracula's to the Frankenstein's to the Mummy's and even the Abbott's and Costello's meetings with whomever, all the way through the slasher icons of the 80s; the Jason's and Freddy's and Michael's of the world.


James Wan brutally gave the slasher sub genre a lethal injection of creativity in its birthing of Jigsaw, a most unusual villain. Clearly influenced by the Giallo pictures of Italy (especially the works of Dario Argento), Wan's film packed quite a lot of suspense and unrelenting terror in its shoestring budget of just over a meager million dollars. The ending was a big surprise, but was eclipsed by the even bigger surprise felt by everyone involved when this little movie sprung a lucrative trap that snagged over a hundred million from patrons. With Wan serving as a producer for the remaining six entries, the films eventually deteriorated into what amounted to gorier big screen versions of CSI with some dark soap opera theatrics.

Being born in Malaysia, a country steeped in supernatural lore of ghosts and black magic, Wan's subsequent movies have delved deeply into supernatural subjects. Displaying an assured hand when it comes to spooktacular thrills, he moved on to the ambitious and much bigger budgeted DEAD SILENCE (2006), a creepy little movie that had a great deal of potential, but failed to realize much of it. Wan's next film, DEATH SENTENCE (2007), likewise bombed badly. That film was essentially a remake of DEATH WISH (1974), loosely based on the novel of the same name that was the inspiration for the classic Bronson picture. For whatever reason, Wan was unable to retain that box office glory when he had a great deal of money at his disposal. Things would change with his next film, though. His best so far is INSIDIOUS (2010), another monumental success with a budget as small as that of SAW and a box office return that almost equaled the new millenniums slasher champion. Despite dealing with familiar topics of late involving demonic forces, the plot was original in that it dealt with the haunted potentiality of astral projection.


Mimicking recent creep-tastic hits such as PARANORMAL ACTIVITY (2007), INSIDIOUS was able to capitalize on primal fears without the use of gimmicks such as the 'shaky cam' and succeeds in taking your breath away in more ways than one. Keep repeating it's only a movie. Hopefully, Wan will be able to maintain his momentum as he is one of the few true horror heroes in today's industry who has had a good degree of success without falling into the remake, or sequel pit. He is currently one of the relatively few true hopes for modern horror these days, and one of the few who doesn't need to resort to extreme gore to grab his audience by the throat.

SAW SEQUEL STAR

Branching away from Wan and in relation to the SAW series, Darren Lynn Bousman has shown himself to be a successful director of horror. However, he has thus far been mostly relegated to helming sequels, or remakes of exploitation favorites. His bizarre REPO! THE GENETIC OPERA (2008) has become something of the new ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW (albeit on a smaller scale) with its built in cult and fans enacting the roles on screen at theater showings. The commerciality of the SAW series has served him better, although this could just as well hinder a career as help it. SAW 2 and 3 are actually worthy sequels that refuse to tamper with the formula, but find ways to keep the familiar territory fresh. The directing style here follows Wan's closely at least until SAW IV (2007). At this point, the series took a nosedive into CSI territory with a beyond convoluted amount of character filler that even Jigsaw wouldn't be able to decipher for one of his complex traps of death. Bousman next tackled a remake for a controversial 80s backwoods horror favorite.

The original MOTHER'S DAY (1980) from director Charles Kaufman was yet another in a long line of rape-torture and revenge movies that were very popular with trash fans throughout the 1970s and early 80s. But it had something the other didn't. It was a blackly comical take on consumerism and America's obsession with products and popular culture masked behind scenes of extreme violence and rape. It's a bizarre combination, but if Romero can mix sadism and subtext, why not somebody else? Lacking the black comedy of the original, the new version possesses a strong pedigree behind the scenes and a standout performance from Rebecca De Mornay. Outside of that, it's nearly indistinguishable from any number of other HOSTEL style torture pictures and 'Home Invasion' movies that have been cropping up with rapidity. Bousman has seemingly followed in Wan's footsteps by switching over to supernatural pictures with 11-11-11 (2011) and the upcoming THE BARRENS (2012). He's so far had some great success in sequels, it remains to be seen if he can separate himself from follow ups and remakes to stand out.

CRAVEN'S CUT PRICE CORPSES


All of horror's big guns have been the subject of remakes. All of horror's big guns are still in the game, yet they're all seemingly running out of bullets. Like an old car, it's eventually going to start giving you problems and it's not going to run as good as it did when it was new and shiny. Wes Craven made a controversial splash in the 1970s delivering a double knock out with THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT (1972) and THE HILLS HAVE EYES (1977). Both films have different settings, but both share story similarities in that they deal with civilized people reduced to savagery to survive. The 70s being a time of great creativity, anger and experimentation (as well as many of these filmmakers stating they didn't know what they were doing), some of these pictures are extremely rough around the edges. This tinge of amateurishness is perceived as either sloppy, or adding to the geek show ambiance. Craven's LAST HOUSE has this vibe to it, and its savage violence will always be the source of its remembrance as opposed to any technical polish it may, or may not have. In the 80s, Craven had the underrated DEADLY BLESSING (1981) and SWAMP THING (1982) that kept him in reasonably good stead with horror fans, but it was his NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET (1984) that . The concept of a maniac slaughtering his victims in their dreams was a novel and frightening one (it was also the source of the 1984 movie, DREAMSCAPE that was released earlier that year).

Lost scene--of numerous others--that no longer exist, or have yet to be found, from LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT (1972)

Unfortunately, Craven fell off the wagon with such clumsy and ill mannered flatulence like the useless sequel, THE HILLS HAVE EYES 2 (1985) and the bewildering DEADLY FRIEND in 1986. Following a similar trajectory akin to Tobe Hooper, more crapola followed bearing titles like SHOCKER (1989), THE PEOPLE UNDER THE STAIRS (1991) and VAMPIRE IN BROOKLYN (1995). Having seemingly lost his touch, with an occasional flash of ingenuity, the director began producing other peoples movies around this time till he essentially reinvented both himself and the slasher sub genre with the hip, self referential, and mocking movie SCREAM in 1996. For today's audiences, the SCREAM series will be Craven's legacy. His movies have been forgettable affairs for the most part and this includes those where he was the producer such as THE BREED (2006), a ridiculous unacknowledged remake of the superior THE PACK from 1977. Craven also took a producer credit on the remake of his own HILLS HAVE EYES and also on the inferior 2007 sequel to the remake of the original (confusing, aint it?). After a failed attempt at cloning his own ELM STREET series (not to mention that ELM STREET was getting its own remake as well) with MY SOUL TO TAKE in 2010, Craven retreated to the safety of the SCREAM series with the fourth chapter; and that, too, failed to recapture the former glory of the once popular pop culture slasher series. Whether he continues his directorial career, Craven's place in horror history is assured. He has had one of the longest careers in horror, despite noticeably fluctuating quality for much of his terror tenure. For me, his best years are from 1972 to 1984.

HOLLYWOOD REMAKE MASSACRE

Having previously discussed the lightning storm of amazing European talent bringing nightmares to vivid life on screen, there are also some Euro talents that have incurred the wrath of horror's fan base on a regular basis. One of those two is Marcus Nispel, a filmmaker who has had an undeniably successful career in commercials and music videos. His horror debut was the 2003 Michael Bay produced remake of Hooper's seminal THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (1974). While it jettisoned the 'Family as Cannibals' plot device, Nispel fashioned a gritty, grubby and grimy little movie that was aided by procuring the services of the original films DP, Daniel Pearl. If the film is guilty of any crime, its being the bacteria that has begat the plague of remakes that hovers over horror and continues to spread like the bite from a reanimated corpse. Nispel's movie was followed by an even nastier sequel from director Jonathan Liebesman entitled THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE: THE BEGINNING (2006).


On a side note, Liebesman had made a strong debut in 2003 with the occasionally scary, but overly silly, DARKNESS FALLS. That films box office success got him the Leatherface gig. As fate would have it, Liebesman was originally attached to the then upcoming Michael Bay produced FRIDAY THE 13TH remake. However, he was subsequently replaced by Marcus Nispel! Liebesman has since went on to directing big and loud mega budget studio pictures like BATTLE: LOS ANGELES (2011) and the soon to be released WRATH OF THE TITANS (2012).

Meanwhile, Nispel essentially turned his version of FRIDAY THE 13TH (2009) into a loose CHAINSAW follow up that never quite feels like a FRIDAY film. Overlong and pacing issues aside, the opening grabs your attention, but fails to keep it for the remainder of the film, despite some fine cinematography again by Daniel Pearl. This franchise made its name on its death scenes and this reboot-reimagining-remake (whatever they're calling them these days) fails miserably in that department. It doesn't skimp on the nudity, though, and has no qualms about paying naked tribute to the many jock ass-sex as sleaze angles that permeated dozens of horror movies during the 1980s. Two other inferior and failed Nispel remakes, PATHFINDER (which had a damn fine trailer[2007]) and CONAN (2010) have done nothing to improve his reputation. Currently, Nispel is still aboard the remake train reportedly at work on an all new version of THE FLY.

FROM A WHISPER TO A WHIMPER

Hollywood is filled with instances of individuals being dealt a cruel twist of fate; filmmakers make a big splash with a down and dirty debut, but fizzle out after being saddled with mediocre material. At the same time, others seem to thrive while continuously cranking out crap. The forgotten Ohio born filmmaker, Jeff Burr is one such director who fell victim of the former. His 1987 horror debut, FROM A WHISPER TO A SCREAM was a raw, taboo trashing and sadistic return of the anthology film that packed necrophilia, cannibalism, incest, child murder and other unsavory's into a 100 minute running time. Boasting a great cast including the likes of Vincent Price, Clu Gulager, Cameron Mitchell and Martine Beswick, WHISPER got a title change when it was briefly unleashed to North American theaters as THE OFFSPRING; a reference to the films first tale. From here, Burr would fall into the bottomless pit of sequels and remakes. His next, actually being pretty good, was the sequel to the sleeper hit, THE STEPFATHER (1987). That film, STEPFATHER 2 (1989), saw Terry O'Quinn return to menace a new family. Meg Foster and Hooper's CHAINSAW 2's Caroline Williams star. In a slight change from the first movie, the level of gore was increased, which lumped this in more comfortably with other horror films that were more blatant about their slasher heritage.

With one impressively creepy gorefest and a well made sequel under his belt, Burr was next attached to direct the much derided third chapter in the TEXAS CHAINSAW saga. This one, LEATHERFACE: THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE 3 (1990), wallowed in its grotesqueries, but suffered severely at the hands of the MPAA. Also, David Schow's original script apparently had a lot of elements that were deemed to disturbing to be filmed (such as dancing with entrails!). The film does have some powerful moments (the opening credits sequence is impressive at capturing the right atmosphere), but unnecessary contrivances such as an Excalibur Chainsaw and silly pseudo comical moments lessen the films overall impact. The trailer featuring Leatherface retrieving the Excalibur saw from a lake prior to it being struck by lightning is better than the actual movie and it features no scenes from the film. After this troubled production, Burr remained trapped in remake purgatory excreting such minor movies like PUMPKINHEAD 2: BLOOD WINGS (1994) and two entries in the PUPPETMASTER series. Working sporadically in the genre, it's a shame he never capitalized on his offensively endearing debut horror feature.

TO BE CONTINUED....

***ALL IMAGES: GOOGLE IMAGES***

Related Posts with Thumbnails

ShareThis

copyright 2013. All text is the property of coolasscinema.com and should not be reproduced in whole, or in part, without permission from the author. All images, unless otherwise noted, are the property of their respective copyright owners.