Amityville 2: the Possession (1982) review
AMITYVILLE 2: THE POSSESSION 1982
James Olson (Father Adamsky), Jack Magner (Sonny Montelli), Rutanya Alda (Dolores Montelli), Burt Young (Anthony Montelli), Diane Franklin (Patricia Montelli), Andrew Prine (Father Tom), Moses Gunn (Det. Turner), Leonardo Cimino (Monsignor)
Directed by Damiano Damiani
The Short Version: Director  Damiani, famous for directing mostly political thrillers and crime  dramas branches out into the horror realm with this slick, but sleazy  sequel to the blockbuster original. The script presents some interesting  angles with which to play around with, but the finished product prefers  to go out of its way to deliver what amounts to a polished exploitation  film. The end result is ripe with domestic violence, incest, flying  furniture and demonic possession culminating in an over the top,  skin-shredding denouement.
The  Montelli family move into their new home only to quickly discover  something has moved in with them and it doesn't want them there. A  demonic force living within the house possesses the eldest son forcing  him to commit murder and only a priest can save the boy and his soul.

This  rude, crude and wholesomely tasteless sequel to the 1979 smash hit  SINsation THE AMITYVILLE HORROR is still the best sequel out of the  entire series. This second chapter is actually a prequel detailing the  actions that occurred in the house before the Lutz family moved in.  While essentially the exact same thing happens, this Dino De Laurentiis  production ramps up the violence and sleazy spectacle in true sequel  fashion. It also wastes no time getting down to business. It's only  twenty five minutes into the film and a priest is already on the grounds  with the intent of blessing the house which is bringing out some  alarmingly dangerous behavior from its occupants.

Almost  from the beginning, we get the feeling that this family is bringing  along some serious and emotionally dysfunctional baggage. While this is  basically a high profile exploitation movie, it also deals with some  very real familial problems and social issues including child abuse,  domestic violence and taboo subjects such as incest. Piled high on top  of that is every devilish trick in the book from flying furniture to  blood coming from the most unlikely of places to demonic possession. The  first half of the movie consists of the build up to the family massacre  while the last half veers off into EXORCIST territory as Father Adamsky  (James Olson) fights to save the soul of a boy possessed by a particularly nasty demonic entity.

The origin of the demon that takes over Sonny's (Jack Magner)  body isn't actually revealed, but clues are laid down that hint towards  a disturbed spirit from an ancient burial ground formerly of the  location where the house currently sits. The evil spirit is first "seen" from the point of view of Franco Di Giacomo's delirious cinematography  as a watchful, probing force that toys with the family at first. There  are knocks at the door at all hours of the night, painting obscene  pictures on the walls, furniture flying around and windows opening and  closing on their own. The ensuing (and supposedly demon stirred)  domestic violence is disturbing, but the Montelli's have already shown  themselves to be built around a fractured foundation. This brittle  family unit is violently turned against each other culminating in the  eldest sons gradual possession leading to a grotesquely cruel sequence  wherein the entire family is systematically executed via shotgun.
Prior  to this, the film explores a forbidden subject that is ripe for this  sort of picture when the demon forces Sonny to seduce his sister. The  two already have an unusually close relationship as it is and this  portion of the film is handled very well regardless of the unsettling  subject matter. Diane Franklin really excels in these scenes in her  attempt to come to grips with what has happened as well as struggling  with confessing it to Father Adamsky. Franklin debuted the same year as  the main female love interest in the superior (if flawed)  sex comedy drama, THE LAST AMERICAN VIRGIN (1982). There are some good  performances here even if the family as a whole isn't very likable from  the start.
In  between ROCKY roles, Burt Young took time out to play essentially the  same part, only here he's a slovenly, ill-mannered family man. Since  we're supposed to believe that the demon turns this family on each  other, their changes in mood and personality are subtly realized  considering they're already a dysfunctional bunch from the start. Horror  fans can also see Burt Young playing the exact same role yet again in  BLOOD BEACH from 1980, only there, he's a cop.
Andrew Prine (left) is no stranger to horror and exploitation movies. Here, he has a supporting role as Father Tom, Adamsky's friend.
There's also some personal demons being fought within Father Adamsky played by James Olson (COMMANDO), but the film never traverses this territory aside from some very vague bits of dialog (why exactly does the priesthood complain about him?).  However, Adamsky does bear some responsibility in that he could have  possibly prevented the Montelli massacre, but this too is never  expounded upon; we only come to this conclusion through the onscreen  visuals. Whether dropped from the film, or simply overlooked in Tommy  Lee Wallace's script (he also wrote and directed HALLOWEEN 3 and FRIGHT NIGHT 2),  the lack of some crucial exposition allows the grue factor to supersede  the potential for numerous character and dramatic arcs. This accent  towards sleazy spectacle will be less palatable for the EXORCIST crowd,  but Damiani does capture several tense moments, but these are more  sporadic than strung together. Furthermore, had Damiani wrote the script  (as he so often did with films he directed), it's likely these areas would have been more fully explored.

The film also defies logic at times (why does nobody hear the guns going off by themselves? Where are the neighbors?),  but truly embraces the absurd during the prosthetic heavy climax. It's  so over the top, one can't help but assume the showstopping and award  winning transformation effects in AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON  (1981) is to blame. Not only is Sonny exorcised, but his face literally  falls apart in a sequence that resembles the body melting finale of THE  EVIL DEAD (1981). In the next scene, he's magically put back together  again and raised in a Christ-like stance while smoke blows around behind  him!
The  score by Lalo Schifrin is a major highlight. Schifrin is one of those  great composers who seems to never get the level of mention as some of  his contemporaries like John Williams or James Horner. Schifrin could  always be counted on to deliver a bang up score that generally made even  the lowliest of picture seem much bigger than it really was. His scores  for DAY OF THE ANIMALS (1977) and THE MANITOU  (1978) for instance, help make both of those predominantly derided  movies a lot more interesting than they likely wouldn't be otherwise.
This shot recalls a similar, famous image from both the film and the poster artwork from the THE EXORCIST (1973).
It may possess (haha)  several similarities with THE EXORCIST (1973), but ever since the  release of THE OMEN (1976), the devil has maintained his cash cow  status. AMITYVILLE 2 was a box office success that resulted in a gradual  decline in "quality" for the  series over the next ten years. POSSESSION fails at perfectly balancing  its drama with its horror. In terms of expressing its disturbing  elements and seedy atmosphere, this first sequel succeeds and revels in  them.
This review is representative of the MGM DVD.
 
 
 
          
      
 
 
copyright 2013. All text is the property of coolasscinema.com and should not be reproduced in whole, or in part, without permission from the author. All images, unless otherwise noted, are the property of their respective copyright owners.
  
12 comments:
This is not only the best sequel in THE AMITYVILLE HORROR franchise, it's the best film! I think the first film is utterly abysmal, the only thing worth defending about it is the memorable Schifrin score. Whereas the first film was about as scary as daylight, this one has a really creepy atmosphere...great review Brian!
Not a big fan of the Amityville movies, but if I did have to make a choice to watch one of them. It would be number 2.
I'm a huge fan of this one, I think it might be even better than the original one, but they are both very different type of films. One is more subtle, dealing with suggested scares, while this second one is more in your face and splashy.
I like the fact that the family was so disfunctional, it lent itself for exploration of the family unit, which is really what many of these films are about, family. Poltergeist for example was also about the family unit. But the family in Amytiville II, boy where they disfunctional!
I also thought this one was influenced by Evil Dead, many sequence where similar, including the thing with the camara following characters around the house.
From all Amityville-themed movies, this is the one I love the most. It's flawed and rips off countless other 70s classics, but overall it's a cool, creepy and very well made sequel.
Great write-up, Brian!
I'm embarrassed to say that I actually saw this at the movies and my friend and I laughed so much. I'm sorry but this is a terrible film.
@ Shaun: Yes, I think I recall your disdain for the first film, Shaun, lol. I think I need to revisit it again. I mainly remember Margot Kidder's boobs over everything else, lol. I think the UK DVD had a commentary track on it. I would love to know how Damiani came to direct this movie. It's so different from his usual.
@ Max: Yeah, this one is the best and the one I will go to if I wanna see one of the films. The one with the haunted clock wasn't too bad, either, but nothing special.
@ Fran: I think I would have bought into the family's plight more had they been less dysfunctional. Then the demon making them turn against each other would have had more resonance; for me anyways.
@ Harry: Thanks so much my friend! I am honestly surprised this series went on for as long as it did so obviously people were interested.
@ Peplum: Sorry you guys didn't enjoy the movie. But we can't all like the same things. I do find the film fascinating mainly for the participation of Damiani as this was unlike anything on his resume and would love to know how and why he chose to do this particular movie.
I saw the original review Siskel and Ebert did for this over at http://siskelandebert.org/video/N44N7DM9RKON/At-the-Movies-Stinkers-of-1982 . They were appalled by it. It actually made me curios to see what got them so riled up.
He's a little more forgiving here in his solo review of the film from the same time. At least in noting the good performances, lol.
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19820101/REVIEWS/201010303/1023
Great review! I still prefer the first Amityville Horror over it's sequel though its still a good movie.
Hi, Alex. I haven't seen the original in quite some time, but do plan on picking up the DVD. I remember seeing it the first time on ABC, I think it was. I didn't even bother with the remake.
Great review. It's an absolutley terrifying movie. I found it very upsetting to watch, especially the scene where the whole family are chased around and killed off one by one. And just for the record 'Peplum' you must be a really sick individual to find this funny. It is nothing of the sort. It's very sad actually.
Thanks for commenting, killer. It's a film that gets better with age!
Post a Comment